home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.snfc21.pbi.net!usenet
- From: mich@pbinet.com
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland should be ashamed. My experience with BC5.0.
- Date: 20 Apr 1996 17:28:36 GMT
- Organization: Pacific Bell Internet Services
- Message-ID: <4lb6s4$hc5@nntp.snfc21.pbi.net>
- References: <4l6d1b$219@linet06.li.net> <4l8j3cINNfbr@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- Reply-To: mich@pbinet.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-5-32.rdcy01.pbinet.com
- X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2.5
-
- In <4l8j3cINNfbr@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) writes:
- >You wouldn't be suffering from such B.S. if you used your favorite editor.
-
- So you sanction Borland foisting a buggy product on the buying public?
-
- >Do you actually have an bugs to report about the *compiler*?
-
- Does it sound plausible that if one end of a product has problems then the
- other end might as well?
-
- >Cry me a river...
-
- What are you, a Borland employee?
-
-